BOMBSHELL: Elon Musk releases the second set of ‘Twitter Files’

Elon Musk releases second set of ‘Twitter files’ The second disclosure of Twitter files confirms long-standing rumors that the corporation maintains a top-secret blacklist used by activist groups to censor information on those accounts. Is. is done to is done which they find objectionable. The bulk of censorship is being motivated by political factors.

Start your engines late by tweeting. Author Matt Tabby reveals another leak of Twitter data from a “blacklist” put together by Twitter activists.

Because of how it handles specific data and records on its organization, Twitter has experienced harsh criticism as of late. Now, a second release of the Twitter files confirms what people have been saying for a long time: The company has secret blacklists that groups of employees use to censor information from accounts they find objectionable. Most censorship is political. ,

Twitter may use these blacklists to restrict the display of certain accounts or popular topics without notifying affected individuals. This information has led to more criticism of the way the company does business and the possibility of content controls being biased.

Elon Musk then, at that point, let me know that individuals who need to campaign for office or are now in office were additionally on the boycott. According to Bari Weiss’s Twitter thread regarding the second release of the Twitter Files, blacklists were created and used by teams of Twitter activists to prevent certain content from trending.

Users have no means of knowing if their content is being restricted and are not notified if their accounts are being censored in this way. Here is a portion from the string: “another #TwitterFiles examination uncovers that Twitter work force groups set up boycotts.

Block disliked tweets from trending and intentionally restrict the visibility of hot topics to individual accounts or even privately without alerting users. At first Twitter’s goal was to give everyone the ability to develop and share ideas and information without limits, but according to Weiss, there were still obstacles.

According to Weiss, during the pandemic lockdown, Twitter blocked renowned Stanford professor Dr J Bhattacharya from posting on the social media platform. Bhattacharya opposed the lockdowns because of their harmful effects on children and was one of the first to criticize them.

In Bari Weiss’ article about the second arrival of the Twitter Records, it was shown that moderate savants Charlie Kirk and Dan Bongino were likewise on the boycott. This restricted his scope and made it hard for individuals to peruse his tweets.

Weiss said Twitter denied engaging in such activities. We don’t shadow ban Twitter executives, said Kevon Bekpour, head of legal policy and trust and head of product, in 2018. He also added: And we certainly don’t ban based on political beliefs or ideology.

Weiss said that what many people refer to as shadow banning is actually what Twitter executives and employees refer to as visibility filtering, or VF. This has been confirmed by several high level sources. The term VF is related to Twitter’s management of user visibility.

It employed VF to block searches for certain individuals, restrict how broadly a tweet could be searched, prevent postings from certain users from ever making the trending page, and prevent those posts from appearing in hashtag searches. Get out of get out show me stop getting involved.

He proceeded, without the clients’ all’s mindfulness, we see a gigantic effect on perceivability. Furthermore, we have a great deal of impact over how your substance is enhanced. A Twitter designer informed us that “customary people have no clue about the amount Weiss composed.

Two more Twitter staff members confirmed they overrode rank-and-file moderators to enforce company rules, revealing the existence of Site Integrity Policy Escalation Support (SIP-PES), which Twitter was built into . executives including former legal director Vijaya Gadde, trust and security chief Joel Roth, and CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agarwal, “and others”.

Weiss said that the Twitter employees he contacted said that the accounts that would be affected would be those with a large number of followers, no tickets or anything for that matter. This is where the biggest, politically sensitive decisions are made, Weiss said.

Popular TikTok user Lib, who was added to the Trend blacklist and warned not to act on users without consulting SIP-PES, was one of the high-profile accounts that were subject to that extra level of scrutiny.

The owner of the Shadow Raichik account was barred from using the service for up to a week at a time, six times in 2022 for a total of eight suspensions.

Weiss said that TikTok’s libel did not technically break the rules, but claimed that Twitter repeatedly informed Raichik that he was banned for doing something that violated the company’s policy against hateful behavior. used to do. ,

It said, “In any case, the board noticed that LTT has not effectively taken part in infringement of the Contemptuous Lead Rules in an inner Taste PES report dated October 2022 following its 6th boycott.”

The committee claimed that her writing promoted online harassment of “hospitals and medical practitioners”, Weiss said, implying that “gender-affirming healthcare is akin to child abuse or grooming.”

Weiss continued to talk about how Libs’ suspension of the TikTok account was separate from actual violations of the platform’s terms of service, such as the one that harassed Raichik.

According to Weiss, who claimed the image is still up, “a picture of her house with her address was released in a tweet that has received over 10,000 likes.”

According to Rebel News, Raichik’s private home address was revealed by Washington Post writer Taylor Lorenz before it was removed by editors.

Weiss says that a screenshot of Joel Roth talking about how the platform’s spam-enforcement features were used to silence users shows that “Twitter employees monitored the display of tweets and topics.” limited.” Talked about the use of “Takes to Do” in internal Slack chat.

In the future, Roth tasked the company’s health, misinformation, privacy and identity research team with providing evidence in favor of increasing the site’s visible filtering options, which he called a “non-removal policy intervention”, and which included de- Amplification and deactivation were included. Are included. Conversation.

When asked about the reasoning behind many of the measures taken, Roth said, “If exposure to misinformation really does cause harm, then we should implement measures that reduce exposure, and Restricting the spread or virality of content is a smart way to achieve this.”

As far as other areas of policy are concerned, he said, “Deployment for civic integrity in the short term has taken a toll on us, but we need to make a strong case for including it in the repertoire of policy reforms.”

After the second batch of Twitter files surfaced, Elon Musk said political candidates were out of the way.

Leave a Comment